WILL SANITY RETURN?

What are your starting points? What are mine?

WILL SANITY EVER RETURN? I’m going crazy here, and I suppose so are you. It seems in the last few weeks that confusion and anxiety have hit new highs. Major contributors seem to be: even more intolerance between interest groups in this country, political wannabes talking past each other, and the threat of Islam from thousands of refugees flooding the West along with who knows how many terrorists. There seems to be no agreement about anything, and as many ‘spins’ as there are talking heads.

WE NEED CLARITY!  I want to insert a few radical truths to help sort through all of this. First, memes are dangerous. They are not cute or slick precisely because they reduce reality to a ‘soundbite’, something to be consumed. This is to our detriment as individuals and as a society.

Statements like these are misleading, deceitful or both: “When we asked for votes, we didn’t ask what their religion was” (a recently elected town council member in Michigan who is Muslim), “right wing religious fundamentalist conspiracies are behind that,” and “terrorists do not represent Islam or any religion.” Then, they become memes.

EVERYBODY HAS A BELIEF SYSTEM. Whether we are speaking of Muslims, Christians, ‘nones’, or non-religious, we are speaking of belief systems / worldviews / cultures. Everybody has them, and every government, institution, and enterprise has a ‘culture’ as well. Nobody and nothing is neutral.

EVERY BELIEF SYSTEM IS RELIGIOUS. The core starting point for every belief system / culture is religious. Yes, ‘religious’. No one and no system is non religious. Maybe they don’t pray to a deity or attend or sponsor religious services, in the popular sense of religious. But they are religious nonetheless. I can say this because every belief system starts with something that they believe is absolutely true, even if not 100% proven, and on which everything they believe ultimately depends. And, even if the rest of their system does not seem religious in the popular sense.

When Christians, whether or not they attend church, defend the Christmas tree and Easter Bunny as ‘Christian’, when Progressives, whether or not they attend their professional associations, defend anything as ‘settled science’, when Muslims, whether or not they attend mosque, do not speak out against terrorism and advocate changing our constitution to allow for Shariah law and the Muslim way, they are speaking out of worldviews / cultures, and therefore core starting points that are religious.

A Christian, whether a regular attender or not reflects to a large degree Christian starting points that are religious, that is, absolute and taken to some degree on faith. A Progressive, whether a member of an association or political party, reflects to a large degree Progressive starting points that are religious, that is, absolute and taken to some degree on faith. A Muslim, whether or not ‘religious’, reflects to a large degree Muslim starting points that are religious, that is, absolute and taken to some degree on faith.

THE QUESTION IS WHICH RELIGION? Everyone has these religious starting points. It is only a matter of which kind they have. So, to call someone from a Muslim culture / worldview ‘non-religious’, or someone from a Christian culture / worldview ‘non-religious’, or someone from a Progressive culture / worldview ‘non-religious’ is really a misnomer. It is unhelpful and untrue.

Worldview / culture = religious starting point

LET’S TALK. The soonest that we can come to understand and agree on this, and operate on its basis, the better we can begin to perceive real reality and unmask false categories, and begin to talk to one another, including those outside our particular group or belief system.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “WILL SANITY RETURN?

  1. Great perspective. As a “none” I still consider myself Christian, because I follow those values I was taught as a child and continue to believe are the best guide for a peaceful world – “Do unto others…” and all of the teachings of Christ stand on their own, whether the creation story is believed, or not.

    Belief in a “settled science” is no better than belief in creation anyway. The big bang is far from a proven thing and is based on a miracle – our universe from nothing. Science has a long way to go to ‘settle” anything that they admit they can only detect 4% of. Dark matter and dark energy can’t be detected, or even described (they can only describe what it is not, since they can’t find it) and that is the other 96% according to the theory – a self admission of ignorance.

    The administration has a similar problem in describing Islamic terrorism. To say ISIS is contained, a JV league, not an Islamic threat, don’t worry about those refugees – all admissions of ignorance.

    • Andrew,
      I’m still new to WP and just found your second comments from a year ago! Sorry, sorry!
      I appreciate your perspective. So much is unproven by scientific testability that we are forced to go to other tests. I can understand the pure naturalist (even though there are very few left) because, if they honestly apply scientific method to the universe they cannot prove God, etc. I have been helped by learning to distinguish between territory (something real like the Louisiana Purchase) and map (human best attempt to depict or theorize about the real territory). Both are real, but different kinds of reality.
      Cheers, Dan

  2. I think I was scanning through my “reader” and found you. I appreciate your thoughtful post and hope others join the discussion – you are a good writer. Best of luck. I’ll check in from time to time.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s